I have a number of formerly good friends who no longer speak to me. These are people I sincerely like, people whom I feel genuinely tender and caring towards, people I’d love to pick up and continue the friendship with. Only they refuse to speak to me. They don’t call; they don’t write. They don’t return calls and they don’t return emails. Usually, the breech comes about as a result of something I’ve said or done; the resulting Spontaneous Relationship Abortion often catches me completely off guard.
I don’t really blame these former friends for cutting off contact. It’s not like I’ve never stopped responding to someone’s desire for continued contact with me. Much like a spontaneous pregnancy abortion though, I feel great sadness when it happens; and I’ve given a lot of thought as to why it happens.
Turning Ghosts into Ancestors
One notion I’ve come up with is that many of these relationship abortions are failed attempts to turn ghosts into ancestors. This is a phrase that Buddhist psychiatrist, Mark Epstein attributes to the great developmental theorist D. W. Winnicott. He’s essentially suggesting that the people from our past by whose actions we’ve suffered trauma (most often our parents, but not always), live in us as ghosts (whether we realize it or not). They remain in that unsteady state until the memories of whatever violations they perpetrated have been fully surfaced and integrated. Friendships (not to mention: marriages and committed partnerships) too often unconsciously serve the surfacing function. But we have few means and methods in our culture that allow us to feed and skillfully work with these hungry ghosts and turn them back into friends, or at least ancestors who no longer reactively hijack our nervous system with what they say and do.
Life is Like a Box of Dukkha
In Buddhism the First Noble Truth speaks of Dukkha, the changing nature of reality. Our inability to warmly embrace shifting reality underlies much suffering in the world. A somewhat different translation of that term dukkha holds special meaning for me: “difficult to face.” Those things that are difficult to face – causing us to turn away from them – often lie at the root of great suffering. Our own and the rest of the world’s.
People who upset us – me, in the case of friends who’ve broken off contact; or ghosts who haven’t become ancestors – fall into that category. We are difficult to face. We make you feel uncomfortable and trigger the desire to turn away. What to do? (One thing NOT to do is try to resolve emotional issues through email. It’s almost guaranteed to make things worse. Email is not robust enough to convey the bulk of emotional expression that social neuroscience knows gets expressed through body language, voice tone and facial expression – not to mention, the intention of the heart).
When I look closely at whether or not repairing ruptured relationships matters, everything I know about brain science and good health, suggests to me that it does. Ruptures in blood vessels, body organs, neural network connections are all adverse experiences with significant downside. Turning away from and ignoring a ruptured spleen or appendix has clear-cut negative consequences. I suspect doing the same with “whole organ-systems” showing up in our lives initially as human friends, has similar consequences, although perhaps not so readily apparent. At a minimum turning away serves to perpetuate the illusion of separation.
Practice Makes Possible
One possibility is to learn practices that can work to help us skillfully manage emotionally hijacked states. We know these states arise primarily from the body releasing stress hormones like adrenaline and cortisol. These hormones were originally designed to save our lives in a time when wildness lived all around us. When friends trigger that nervous system response, the brain immediately associates those friends with the discomfort we feel, even though the seeds of that discomfort may have been planted long ago. Those are the seeds of self-protection and give rise to the need to safeguard my vulnerability: experience has taught me that many people who abort relationships mistake vulnerability for weakness and often unconsciously go on the attack in its presence. Until those “friends'” brain networks mature in their wisdom and impulse control circuitry, I’m happy to be spared their friendship.
Essentially then, my work seems to be to spend time intimately learning when and how my body generates stress hormones, and then develop me-specific ways of managing them. Part of this learning involves observing how my body reacts to surfacing threat-memories, and how it responds to attack when I feel vulnerable. As I do, it’s possible to practice remembering, “It’s not me; it’s my brain (and my body).” And since so much of the brain’s resources are designed and dedicated to physical body movement, a long walk or a short run can usually re-balance my system.
But each of us is unique in the way we react to and recover from stress-inducing apparitions from our past. Recovery time can also depend on the nature and duration of the stress, along with other things in my life that might be hassling me. If my stress levels are already high, it won’t take much to make me “jump the hump” and displace my anger or frustration onto the nearest warm body. Not usually great for sustaining friendships, or intimate primary relationships, for that matter. Unless, of course, my friends recognize, “It’s not Mark; it’s his brain” and have sufficient desire, awareness, wisdom and resolve to re-establish the attuned heart connection.
Really interesting Mark.
Have you seen the new movie, The Banshees of Inishrin?
<
div><div class=”grp grp-kgHeaderTit
No, I haven’t. Is Banshees about relationship repair?
XOXOX Mark
It’s been a great pleasure to have been one of your friends and partners in subversive activity for 20 years. Disruptions, misunderstandings, repairs, laughter, absurdity, sharing desperation, and all. Maybe one day you can discuss resilient friendships too. They sustain us. And I am ever grateful to have resilient friends like you dear Mark.
Thanks, Jeanne. los sentimientos son mutuos!
I actually wrote and posted it on the blog 10 years ago. I recently reread it, thought: “Who wrote this. This is good!”, retitled it and simply reposted it! 🙂
Thank you for that. I’ve been filling my brain with NO CONTACT articles, so this is a great balance. You used our own human system as a metaphor for healing and I can’t help but ask about the option of surgical removal when something in the system is toxic? I’m probably looking for more evidence to support my difficult choice for removing some people from my system 🤔.
Hi Nancy, One central and crucial element that I didn’t write about is the need to keep people with dark, disorganized trauma energy OUT of our lives. We can instead hold them in our heart-memories and wish healing integration for them. When they are hopefully safely put back together, we might attempt reconnection. Blessings, Mark
A long note to add to this. People can be and are dysregulated and wounded, including us. Mark writes about this often. It is somewhat inevitable that two people who who wind up on a day mutually dysregulated will find a moment to combust? Especially if they care about each other at all. That is the realm of the human. Staying away from the “other” more dysregulated or “toxic” one may be an answer, but not a great one. If you care about them and share a lot of history, are they really so totally much more toxic than you? I don’t know. Maybe.
I would like to add a couple of thoughts here. Relationships are a system of energy. They can get sick and they always need to breathe and change. We often fail to let them. We generally think when this system goes awry it is the other wrong person, but we both take part in the dance.
Space is needed for healing and growing a relationship when it gets sick. Sometimes a lot of space and time. But it is not a great remedy on its own. We have to examine the reason for being of this relationship, what you were trying to do together in the first place, and whether the thing is more or less complete. If you completed it, sometimes people find fights a good way to find closure….(NOT). There is also the question of context and whether there are resources available to re-regulate relationships. Communities that work well, help stabilize relationships. Roles are clear. Let’s notice that we got some of that missing from most of our lives.
Interesting that we never really look at the whole picture as a system, but think it is about the other. I am not so sure. In this system it is pretty danged easy to be dysregulated. But we are surely missing each other too often. And pushing away, on its own, doesn’t help much.
Yes, yes, and yes. And we have a LOT of community lack and clear roles missing from the modern developed world. Most of us don’t even realize it’s missing. Years ago, a multidisciplinary team of 33 children’s doctors came together and wrote a 4 page clear prediction need identifying 6 areas for contemporary culture to address: Hardwired to Connect – the Case for Authoritative Community. I urge anyone interested to read it (https://www.nurturingparenting.com/images/cmsfiles/hardwired_to_connect.pdf).
Thanks for this Mark – I was just talking about ruptures and repairs this weekend with a close friend and this adds some depth to my thoughts on this. I agree with your comment above that sometimes keeping the highly dys-regulated out of our lives and hold them in our heart memories. My system can’t handle being around too much dysregulation for long or I join them in that state of dysregulation! Thanks for continuing to share Mark! xoxo
The kind of contagion dysregulation you’re describing, Lisa, is a vulnerability of the nervous system for most of us in my experience. Thus the need for training and practice. But where does a person find and get such training and practice? Again, unfortunately, nowhere unless someone deliberately seeks it out, much like we must seek out and practice piano-playing or martial arts or fine arts. Keep practicing. XOXOX Mark
Once again, a timely message; holding feuds is just boring anyway and I finally got a copy of kathleen singh’s last book,….. and because the sno-isle does not carry that title, i bought it…..$11 at Thriftbooks, in like new condition, some underlined passages, but that’s a good thing…. so on my way to understanding more of the big picture………thanks for the suggestion–also timely.
I’ll wait to hear what you think, Jeanne. Best, Mark
I just ordered The Myth of Normal and look forward to reading the article. Is that what you meant? Will report the news. If my poor brain can remember. : -)
Thanks for the explanation. You are correct, retraining the stress systems of the body is a long-term project, so it seems.
Nice work if we can totally master it, Mike! 😉 Best, Mark